|
|
|
|
오현수 ( Oh Hyun-Soo ) - 인하대학교 간호학과
서화숙 ( Seo Wha-Sook ) - 인하대학교 간호학과
박종숙 ( Park Jong-Suk ) - 인하대학교병원
배은경 ( Bae Eun-Kyung ) - 인하대학교병원
이수진 ( Lee Su-Jin ) - 인하대학교병원
정윤예 ( Chung Youn-Yee ) - 인하대학교병원
최영은 ( Choi Young-Eun ) - 인하대학교병원
최희정 ( Choi Hee-Jeong ) - 인하대학교병원
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose: This study was conducted to test criterion-related validity of the Critical Patients’ Severity Classification System (CPSCS) developed by the Hospital Nurses’ Association by examining relationships with brain injury severity measured by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), recovery state measured by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), and days of stay in ICU of brain injury patients.
Methods: Prospective correlational research design was adopted by including 194 brain injury patients admitted to ICU of one university hospital.
Results: The score of CPSCS appeared to significantly discriminate the severity of brain injury. Among nursing activities in CPSCS, Respiratory therapy, IV Infusion and Medication, Monitoring, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Treatment and Procedure were significant to discriminate the severity of brain injury. Respiratory therapy, Vital Signs, and Monitoring appeared to significantly discriminate the recovery states of 1- and 3-months. Nursing activities significantly contributed to predict the days of ICU stay were Respiratory therapy, ADL, and Teaching and Emotional Support.
Conclusion: CPSCS developed by the Hospital Nurses Association appeared to be valid to discriminate or predict brain injury severity, recovery states, and days of stay in ICU for brain injury patients.
|
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
준거 타당도, 중증도 분류, 뇌손상
Criterion-related validity, Severity classification, Brain injury
|
|
|
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
|
|
|
|
|
등재저널 정보
|
|
 
|
|
|
|
|